Mens Rea в уголовном праве Соединенных Штатов Америки - Геннадий Александрович Есаков

P.H Causing the Conditions of One’s Own Defense: A Study in the Limits of Theory in Criminal Law Doctrine // Virginia Law Review. Charlottesville (Va.), 1985. Vol. 71, № 1. P. 1–63.

203. Robinson P.H. Criminal Law Defenses: A Systematic Analysis // Columbia Law Review. N.Y., 1982. Vol. 82, № 2. P. 199–291.

204. Roman M.J. Comment, «Once More Unto the Breach, Dear Friends, Once More»: A Call to Re-Evaluate the Felony-Murder Doctrine in the Wake of State v. Oimen and State v. Rivera 11 Marquette Law Review. Milwaukee (Wis.), 1994. Vol. 77, № 4. P. 785–828.

205. Roth N.E., Sundby S.E. The Felony-Murder Rule: A Doctrine at Constitutional Crossroads // Cornell Law Review. Ithaca (N.Y.), 1985. Vol. 70, № 3. P. 446–492.

206. Roulston R.P. Introduction to Criminal Law in New South Wales. Sydney: Butterworths, 1975. xiv p., 225 p.

207. Ryu P. K., Silving H. Error Juris: A Comparative Study // The University of Chicago Law Review. Chicago, 1957. Vol. 24, № 3. P. 421–471.

208. Sayre F.B. Book Review, Glueck: Mental Disorder and the Criminal Law // Harvard Law Review. Cambridge (Mass.), 1926. Vol. 39, № 4. P. 520–523.

209. Sayre F.B. Mens Rea II Harvard Law Review. Cambridge (Mass.), 1932. Vol. 45, № 6. P. 974–1026.

210. Sayre F.B. Public Welfare Offenses // Columbia Law Review. N.Y., 1933. Vol. 33, № 1. P. 55–88.

211. Sayre F.B. The Present Signification of Mens Rea in the Criminal Law // Harvard Legal Essays / Written in Honour of and Printed to Joseph Beale and Samuel Williston, by Morton Carlisle Campbell, Zechariah Chafee, Jr., Edwin Merrick Dodd, Jr., & c. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press, 1934. P. 399–417.

212. Schmitthoff M. The Science of Comparative Law // The Cambridge Law Journal. L., 1939. Vol. 7, № 1. P. 94–110.

213. Schopp R.F. Reconciling «Irreconcilable» Capital Punishment Doctrine as Comparative and Noncomparative Justice // Florida Law Review. Gainesville (Fla.), 2001. Vol. 53, № 3. P. 475–527.

214. Schulz F. Bracton and Raymond de Penafort // The Law Quarterly Review. L, 1945. Vol. 61, № 243. P. 286–292.

215. Schwartz D.W. Note, Imposing the Death Sentence for Felony Murder on a Non-Triggerman // Stanford Law Review. Stanford, 1985. Vol. 37, № 3. P. 857–888.

216. Scrutton T.E. Roman Law in Bracton // The Law Quarterly Review. L, 1885. Vol. 1, № 4. P. 425–441.

217. Sendor B.B. Crime as Communication: An Interpretive Theory of the Insanity Defense and the Mental Elements of Crime // The Georgetown Law Journal. Washington, 1986. Vol. 74, № 6. P. 1371–1434.

218. Simons K.W. Book Review: Self-Defense, Mens Rea, and Bernhard Goetz // Columbia Law Review. N.Y., 1989. Vol. 89, № 5. P. 1179–1200.

219. Simons K.W. Mistake and Impossibility, Law and Fact, and Culpability: A Speculative Essay // Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology. Baltimore (Md.), 1990. Vol. 81, № 1. P. 447–517.

220. Simons K.W. Rethinking Mental States // Boston University Law Review. Boston (Mass.), 1992. Vol. 72, № 3. P. 463–554.

221. Simons K. W. The Relevance of Community Values to Just Deserts: Criminal Law, Punishment Rationales, and Democracy // Hofstra Law Review. Hempstead (N.Y.), 2000. Vol. 28, № 3. P. 635–666.

222. Simons K.W. When is Strict Liability Just? // Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology. Baltimore (Md.), 1997. Vol. 87, № 4. P. 1075–1137.

223. Singer R. The Model Penal Code and Three Two (Possibly Only One) Ways Courts Avoid Mens Rea // Buffalo Criminal Law Review. Buffalo (N.Y.), 2000. Vol. 4, № 1. P. 139–216.

224. Singer R., HusakD. Of Innocence and Innocents: The Supreme Court and Mens Rea Since Herbert Packer // Buffalo Criminal Law Review. Buffalo (N.Y.), 1999. Vol. 2, № 2. P. 861–945.

225. Singer R.G. The Proposed Duty to Inquire as Affected by Recent Criminal Law Decisions in the United States Supreme Court // Buffalo Criminal Law Review. Buffalo (N.Y.), 2000. Vol. 3, № 2. P. 701–754.

226. Singh R. U. History of the Defence of Drunkenness in English Criminal Law // The Law Quarterly Review. L., 1933. Vol. 49, № 196. P. 528–546.

227. Smith A.T.H. Judicial Law Making in the Criminal Law // The Law Quarterly Review. L., 1984. Vol. 100, № 1. P. 46–76.

228. Smith J.C. The Guilty Mind in the Criminal Law // The Law Quarterly Review. L., 1960. Vol. 76, № 301. P. 78–99.

229. Smith J.C. Two Problems in Criminal Attempts // Harvard Law Review. Cambridge (Mass.), 1957. Vol. 70, № 3. P. 422–448.

230. Stallybrass W.T.S. The Eclipse of Mens Rea II The Law Quarterly Review. L, 1936. Vol. 52, № 205. P. 60–67.

231. Stephen H. Homicide by Necessity // The Law Quarterly Review. L, 1885. Vol. 1, № 1. P. 51–61.

232. Stephen J.F. A Digest of the Criminal Law (Indictable Offences). 9th ed., by Lewis F. Sturge. L.: Sweet & Maxwell, Ltd., 1950. xlviii p., 580p.

233. Stephen J.F. A History of the Criminal Law of England. In Three Volumes. Vol. I. L.: MacMillan and Co., 1883. xv [iii] p., 576 p.

234. Stiles G.T. Comment, North Carolina’s Unconstitutional Expansion of an Ancient Maxim: Using DWI Fatalities to Satisfy First Degree Felony-Murder // Campbell Law Review. Buies Creek (N.C.), 1999. Vol. 22, № 1. P. 169–209.

235. Story J. Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States; With a Preliminary Review of the Constitutional History of the Colonies and States, Before the Adoption of the Constitution: In Three Volumes. Volume I. Boston: Hilliard, Gray and Company; Cambridge (Mass.): Brown, Shattuck, And Co., 1833. xxxiv p., 494 p.

236. Stuart D. Supporting General Principles for Criminal Responsibility in the Model Penal Code with Suggestions for Reconsideration: A Canadian Perspective // Buffalo Criminal Law Review. Buffalo (N.Y.), 2000. Vol. 4, № 1. P. 13–51.

237. Stubbs W. Select Charters and Other Illustrations of English Constitutional History from the Earliest Times to the Reign of Edward the First. 5th ed. Oxford: At the Clarendon Press, 1884. xii p., 552 + 36 p.

238. Sudduth T.